AboutWhat's newContact & demo
Third-Party Risk ManagementAvailable now

Is this evidence good enough? Know before you accept.

AI assesses each piece of vendor evidence against the question it answers. Integrity checks, requirement-by-requirement sufficiency with verified quotes, your admissibility rules and calculated validity dates all come back, and a person decides.

Illustration with sample data

Overview

What AI Vendor Evidence Assessment does

Every result covers one evidence file, assessed in the context of one assessment, question and answer. Integrity is checked deterministically: file hashes, type and signature, malware reputation, tampering and provenance, and a check that couldn't run shows Unknown, never Pass. Sufficiency is assessed requirement by requirement against the question's acceptance criteria, and every quote is verified against the document's text.

Admissibility is decided only by the rules you configure in TPRM governance. Validity and expiry dates are calculated by RiskVantis, not the AI. The recommendation can never be to accept evidence that failed integrity or admissibility. People accept, accept with conditions, request more, clarify, reject or escalate, and overriding the recommendation needs a reason. Results are versioned and marked out of date when anything changes.

Magnifying glass on a white table
Capabilities

Key capabilities

01

Integrity checks

Hashes, file signature, malware reputation, tampering and provenance.

02

Requirement sufficiency

Against acceptance criteria, with quotes verified in the document.

03

Your admissibility rules

Only configured rules decide admissibility.

04

Calculated validity

Dates read from the document, with statuses and day counts calculated by rules.

05

People decide

Accept, conditions, request more, clarify, reject or escalate.

06

Versioned & stale-aware

Re-runs are new versions; changes mark results out of date.

Benefits

The business case.

Efficiency, multi-framework alignment, reduced complexity and streamlined processes: what AI Vendor Evidence Assessment changes for your programme.

Potential savings
>75%

Less evidence review time

Reviewers start from a structured assessment instead of reading every page.

Risk reduction
Tampering caught

Integrity first

Hash, signature and provenance checks run before anything else.

Achieving compliance
Consistent

Same rules for every vendor

Admissibility and validity follow your configured rules.

Visibility & decision-making
Explainable

Quotes you can verify

Every claim points to text found in the document.

Efficiency figures compare the effort of each workflow cycle in RiskVantis with the same work done manually or in a traditional GRC tool. Your result depends on your starting point; we will model it with you in a demo.

How it works

From setup to outcome.

Collect

The vendor uploads evidence against a question.

Assess

Integrity, sufficiency, admissibility and validity run in the background.

Decide

The reviewer accepts, requests more or rejects, with a reason for overrides.

Track

Requests and findings follow through the assessment.

Framework alignment

Supports your obligations.

AI Vendor Evidence Assessment contributes evidence and coverage to these frameworks and regulations.

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (A.5.19–A.5.22)SOC 2 (CC9.2)NIS2 (Art. 21)APRA CPS 234

All supported frameworks

FAQ

Common questions.

Does the AI accept evidence?

No. It recommends; a person decides, and overriding the recommendation needs a reason.

Can the AI invent quotes?

Quotes are verified against the document's extracted text, and unverifiable quotes are flagged rather than shown as verified.

Are results reused across assessments?

No. Each result belongs to one assessment and one evidence version.

See AI Vendor Evidence Assessment in action.

Book a 30-minute walkthrough tailored to your frameworks, vendors and team.